Well.
Effectiveness of our lessons/ teachings massively depend on satisfying power
and level of learner’s needs and for this reason for me and my colleague
teachers, “Students” and their “surroundings” become as prime focus in our
teaching activity.
My
teaching experiences reflects me that even the first day, I become too much
anxiety to learn at least some attributes of my students like: name, family
(brothers and sisters), ambitions, hobbies etc and I develop a sort of small
biography for each of my student through a creation of scrap book, name game,
name tags, first day celebrations in my first class usually. My Student
Inventory and biography largely influences my lesson planning and preparation
for the lesson. The Questions is why is this so? Here are some of my
experiences.
Learning
names of students itself develop self-confidence in myself, smoothens the
teaching and learning activity by removing the alien-feelings among students
and teachers. Perhaps, it might be always good to learn students learning
styles with more interactions.
Let
me share you a time where I had a student who did not participate in class
lessons and who was not responsive. She was in Grade 11 and I thought the
subject “Economics” at that time for her. Grade 11 Economics Subject demands
higher level of application and analysis. She largely ignored my teachings and gave
little attention to lessons though she was not showing any disruptive behavior.
I am sure it might be so wrong to tell her parents that she was not learning
and she was dull. I believe talking “dull” and “brilliant” about our students
is of now old-fashion. However, when I
assessed the students of my class with first assessment, she came out with
highest score. Her academic language; English was perfect and answers were too
good to comment on. Her answers almost matched my mark scheme answers. Was this
a co-incidence? Or did she copied or did I gave the test paper before? None of
these had happened.
From
this incident, I judged the pointed student was a gifted student though she did
not participate in my lesson so actively. Therefore, the teacher might perhaps,
be little confused about these students from classroom teaching and learning,
where too I was doubtful about my student.
Another
incident that I experienced while teaching grade 8 student the same subject
“Economics”. Even though we feel that grade 8 economics scheme is simple and
easy, in real sense, students are introduced to new concepts when they transits
from grade 7 to grade 8.
This
student seems hyper-active in class, had a cultivated habit of asking questions
and clarifications and he was responsive and completed work regularly. He was
the first to finish class work. However, I feel quite pity when I saw his
semester marks. He exactly secured class average marks. From this point I
studied the student in detail and later found he is facing some learning
difficulties. He has problem with memorizing (long-term memory) and also he
lacks the required level of academic language to that grade. More so, from PTA
meetings, I found he is faced with some home problems. He lived with not his
real parents and he was from another island.
These
experiences reveal me that I was teaching a mixed ability student class.
However in sometimes, in some schools they divide the class depending on scores
and classes are ability-wise categorized. For me, this is not very encouraging.
It is very clear from these incidents that when I know well my students, I can
use the correct instructional methods in a student-centered teaching and
learning context catering for individual differences and multiple
intelligences. This also provided me a deep thinking while writing my lesson
plans for the particular class.
Another
inference from these incidents is that all students learn in different ways at
different paces and all students have special needs.
Also
it made much easier for me to give reasoning for their behaviors and reasoning
for low/ high marks in PTA meetings and it enabled me the right counseling for
right parent. If I did not have learnt the facts about those two students I
might have interpreted the scenario wrongly and also their behavior will not be
improved.
This
research fact we should bear in our mind;
- Research says that the students performance increases when the instructional methods match the individual strengths and characteristics of learners – Corno and Snow 1986, Cronbach and Snow 1981.
- Research also says that the achievement can be increased when the instructional method favors the learner’s natural modalities for learning (Cushner, McClelland, and Safford 1992; Messick 1995)
Therefore,
it is very important to have a keen understanding of our learners to make
teaching and learning a success and I myself try to learn the following facts
of my learners to the best ability that I can in order to develop my learning
outcomes, lesson planning and selection of a instructional methods and also for
assessment and evaluation mode of a lesson.
1.
Family
background/ Home life
2.
Socio-Economic
Status (SES) of the learner
3.
Learner Ability
Level
4.
Learning Style
5.
Academic Merit
6.
Personality of
the learner
7.
Cultural
Diversity (not very much applicable to learners)
8.
Experiences and
prior-knowledge
9.
Peers
10. Student’s Interest and hobbies
11. Academic language level of learner
12. If abroad color, customs, religion, cast and class etc (this is not
very much applicable in Maldives) = culture and ethnicity
I
always believe that it is the time when I can meet and satisfy the unique
characteristics of learners that makes my teaching successful. Teachers should
take enough time in learning the learners and the judgment we made from our
first meeting need not be very appropriate. We do this by more social
interactions and focusing on individual student behavior at times.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you very much for your comment. Your comment will be published after moderation by blogger.